SendKit
Login
Apollo.iovsReply.io

Apollo vs Reply.io (2026): Compared

We compared Apollo and Reply.io on sales intelligence, AI agents, and pricing. Two full platforms, different strengths. SendKit offers dedicated IPs.

4 min readUpdated Mar 2026

The Verdict

Apollo is better if you need a full sales intelligence platform with buyer intent data, a CRM, and a free plan to start. Reply.io is better if you want an autonomous AI SDR agent (Jason) and a larger database. Apollo has deeper data intelligence.

Reply.io has stronger outreach automation. Neither includes dedicated IPs.

The third option

Both Apollo and Reply.io run on shared infrastructure with no dedicated IP option. SendKit includes dedicated IPs and isolated sending on every plan from $99/mo with flat-rate pricing and all deliverability tools.

Apollo.io vs Reply.io vs SendKit

FeatureApollo.ioApollo.ioReply.ioReply.ioSendKit
Infrastructure
Dedicated IPs
No

No dedicated IP option

No

No dedicated IP option

Every plan

Dedicated IPs on all plans from $99/mo

Isolated Infrastructure
No

Shared infrastructure

No

Shared infrastructure

Yes

Fully isolated sending

Pricing
Pricing Model
Per-user + credits

$49-$79+ per user per month

Tiered / AI agent

$49-$166/mo email; $259/mo AI SDR

Flat rate

Flat monthly pricing from $99/mo

Starting Price
Free / $49/user/mo

Free plan, Basic at $49/user/mo

$49/mo

Email Volume starting tier

$99/mo

Essential: 75K emails, 30K leads, dedicated IPs

Features
AI SDR Agent
No

No autonomous AI agent

Jason AI ($259/mo)

Autonomous AI SDR

No

No AI agent

Lead Database
275M+ contacts

Core product with intent data

1B+ contacts

Built-in database

Built-in finder

Lead finder included

Intent Data
Yes

Buyer intent signals and alerts

No

No buyer intent data

No

Not available

CRM
Built-in

Full CRM with deal tracking

Built-in

CRM pipeline management

Yes

Built-in pipeline CRM

Channels
LinkedIn Automation
Task-based

LinkedIn steps as manual tasks

Yes

LinkedIn automation in sequences

No

Email and phone focused

Built-in Dialer
Yes

Dialer on Professional and above

Yes

Cloud calling available

Yes

Native cold calling on every plan

Other
Free Plan
900 credits/month

Free plan with limited features

No

No free plan

No

Demo available

Scale
White-label
No

No white-label

No

No white-label

From $499/mo

Full white-label on Pro plan

Neither offers dedicated IPs

SendKit includes dedicated IPs and isolated infrastructure on every plan.

Get Started

Pricing: Apollo vs Reply.io

Apollo has a free plan with 900 credits per month. Basic is $49/user/mo with 30K credits. Professional is $79/user/mo with a dialer and 48K credits.

Organization is $149/user/mo with intent data. Reply.io Email Volume runs from $49/mo to $166/mo. Jason AI (autonomous SDR) is $259/mo.

Reply.io does not charge per seat on the Email Volume plan. Apollo is cheaper to start with its free plan. For a solo user, Apollo Professional at $79/mo gives you more sales intelligence than Reply.io at $49/mo.

But for autonomous outreach, Reply.io Jason at $259/mo has no Apollo equivalent. The platforms serve different needs at different price points.

Key takeaways

  • Apollo has a free plan; Reply.io does not
  • Apollo Professional $79/user/mo vs Reply.io Email Volume $49-$166/mo
  • Reply.io Jason AI at $259/mo for autonomous outreach
  • Apollo charges per user; Reply.io has volume-based email plans

Data: Intelligence vs Volume

Apollo has a 275M+ database with buyer intent data, job change alerts, technology stack filters, and company signals. The data layer is Apollo strongest differentiator. You can identify companies actively looking for solutions and prioritize outreach accordingly.

Reply.io has a larger database at 1B+ contacts but without the intelligence layer. No intent data, no job change alerts, no tech stack filters. Reply.io database is focused on contact volume, not data depth.

For targeted, intent-based prospecting, Apollo is the stronger platform. For raw contact volume, Reply.io has more records.

Key takeaways

  • Apollo: 275M+ with intent data, job changes, tech stack
  • Reply.io: 1B+ contacts without intelligence layer
  • Apollo is better for targeted prospecting
  • Reply.io has more raw contact volume

AI Agents and Outreach

Reply.io differentiator is Jason AI, an autonomous SDR at $259/mo. Jason handles lead discovery, sequence creation, outreach, and reply management. It also includes LinkedIn automation with automated connection requests and messages.

Apollo does not have an autonomous AI agent. Sequences include email, manual LinkedIn task steps, and calling. Apollo approach is more traditional: you research, build lists, create sequences, and manage campaigns manually.

The AI assists with email writing but does not run autonomously. Both include a CRM and dialer. Apollo CRM is deeper with deal tracking and revenue analytics.

Reply.io CRM is functional but simpler.

Key takeaways

  • Reply.io Jason AI runs outreach autonomously
  • Apollo uses traditional manual sequence building
  • Apollo LinkedIn steps are manual tasks; Reply.io automates them
  • Both include CRM and dialer

Start sending today

Set up in 15 minutes. Dedicated IPs on every plan.

Get Started

Why Consider SendKit Instead

Apollo and Reply.io are both full platforms that go beyond basic cold email. If you need sales intelligence, Apollo is the right choice. If you want AI-driven autonomous outreach, Reply.io is the right choice.

But both run on shared infrastructure with no dedicated IPs. If cold email deliverability is what drives your results, SendKit provides what neither platform includes: dedicated IPs and isolated infrastructure on every plan from $99/mo. SendKit uses flat-rate pricing with no per-user charges.

Built-in dialer, CRM, and all deliverability tools. It does not have sales intelligence or an AI SDR. It is built for teams where infrastructure determines results.

Key takeaways

  • Dedicated IPs on every plan from $99/mo
  • Flat-rate pricing vs per-user
  • No sales intelligence or AI SDR
  • Built for teams where infrastructure drives results

Pros & Cons

Apollo.io

Strengths

  • 275M+ database with buyer intent data
  • Built-in CRM with deal tracking
  • Free plan to start
  • Dialer on Professional and above
  • Deep sales intelligence with alerts

Limitations

  • No dedicated IPs
  • Per-user pricing is expensive for teams
  • No autonomous AI SDR agent
  • LinkedIn steps are manual tasks

Reply.io

Strengths

  • Jason AI SDR for autonomous outreach ($259/mo)
  • 1B+ contact database built in
  • LinkedIn automation in sequences
  • Cloud calling and CRM
  • Email validation included

Limitations

  • No dedicated IPs
  • No buyer intent data or sales intelligence
  • Jason AI at $259/mo is expensive
  • No free plan

SendKit

Strengths

  • Dedicated IPs on every plan from $99/mo
  • Flat-rate pricing
  • All deliverability tools included
  • Built-in dialer and CRM
  • 75,000 emails/month on the $99 plan

Limitations

  • No sales intelligence or intent data
  • No AI SDR agent
  • 700M+ database is smaller than Reply.io's 1B+ contacts
  • Newer platform with a smaller user community

Ready to switch?

Your reputation, your control. No shared infrastructure.

Get Started

Keep reading

Sources

sendkitG2Website
frequently asked questions

Got questions? We've got answers.

Apollo is better for sales intelligence with intent data and a deeper CRM. Reply.io is better for AI-driven autonomous outreach with Jason AI. Different tools for different workflows.

start sending today

Ready to hit primary?

Set up SendKit's isolated infrastructure and start sending in under 15 minutes.

Dedicated IPs on every plan. Cancel anytime.