vs
Apollo vs Reply.io (2026): Compared
We compared Apollo and Reply.io on sales intelligence, AI agents, and pricing. Two full platforms, different strengths. SendKit offers dedicated IPs.
The Verdict
Apollo is better if you need a full sales intelligence platform with buyer intent data, a CRM, and a free plan to start. Reply.io is better if you want an autonomous AI SDR agent (Jason) and a larger database. Apollo has deeper data intelligence.
Reply.io has stronger outreach automation. Neither includes dedicated IPs.
The third option
Both Apollo and Reply.io run on shared infrastructure with no dedicated IP option. SendKit includes dedicated IPs and isolated sending on every plan from $99/mo with flat-rate pricing and all deliverability tools.
Apollo.io vs Reply.io vs SendKit
| Feature | Apollo.io | Reply.io | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Infrastructure | |||
| Dedicated IPs | No No dedicated IP option | No No dedicated IP option | Every plan Dedicated IPs on all plans from $99/mo |
| Isolated Infrastructure | No Shared infrastructure | No Shared infrastructure | Yes Fully isolated sending |
| Pricing | |||
| Pricing Model | Per-user + credits $49-$79+ per user per month | Tiered / AI agent $49-$166/mo email; $259/mo AI SDR | Flat rate Flat monthly pricing from $99/mo |
| Starting Price | Free / $49/user/mo Free plan, Basic at $49/user/mo | $49/mo Email Volume starting tier | $99/mo Essential: 75K emails, 30K leads, dedicated IPs |
| Features | |||
| AI SDR Agent | No No autonomous AI agent | Jason AI ($259/mo) Autonomous AI SDR | No No AI agent |
| Lead Database | 275M+ contacts Core product with intent data | 1B+ contacts Built-in database | Built-in finder Lead finder included |
| Intent Data | Yes Buyer intent signals and alerts | No No buyer intent data | No Not available |
| CRM | Built-in Full CRM with deal tracking | Built-in CRM pipeline management | Yes Built-in pipeline CRM |
| Channels | |||
| LinkedIn Automation | Task-based LinkedIn steps as manual tasks | Yes LinkedIn automation in sequences | No Email and phone focused |
| Built-in Dialer | Yes Dialer on Professional and above | Yes Cloud calling available | Yes Native cold calling on every plan |
| Other | |||
| Free Plan | 900 credits/month Free plan with limited features | No No free plan | No Demo available |
| Scale | |||
| White-label | No No white-label | No No white-label | From $499/mo Full white-label on Pro plan |
Neither offers dedicated IPs
SendKit includes dedicated IPs and isolated infrastructure on every plan.
Pricing: Apollo vs Reply.io
Apollo has a free plan with 900 credits per month. Basic is $49/user/mo with 30K credits. Professional is $79/user/mo with a dialer and 48K credits.
Organization is $149/user/mo with intent data. Reply.io Email Volume runs from $49/mo to $166/mo. Jason AI (autonomous SDR) is $259/mo.
Reply.io does not charge per seat on the Email Volume plan. Apollo is cheaper to start with its free plan. For a solo user, Apollo Professional at $79/mo gives you more sales intelligence than Reply.io at $49/mo.
But for autonomous outreach, Reply.io Jason at $259/mo has no Apollo equivalent. The platforms serve different needs at different price points.
Key takeaways
- Apollo has a free plan; Reply.io does not
- Apollo Professional $79/user/mo vs Reply.io Email Volume $49-$166/mo
- Reply.io Jason AI at $259/mo for autonomous outreach
- Apollo charges per user; Reply.io has volume-based email plans
Data: Intelligence vs Volume
Apollo has a 275M+ database with buyer intent data, job change alerts, technology stack filters, and company signals. The data layer is Apollo strongest differentiator. You can identify companies actively looking for solutions and prioritize outreach accordingly.
Reply.io has a larger database at 1B+ contacts but without the intelligence layer. No intent data, no job change alerts, no tech stack filters. Reply.io database is focused on contact volume, not data depth.
For targeted, intent-based prospecting, Apollo is the stronger platform. For raw contact volume, Reply.io has more records.
Key takeaways
- Apollo: 275M+ with intent data, job changes, tech stack
- Reply.io: 1B+ contacts without intelligence layer
- Apollo is better for targeted prospecting
- Reply.io has more raw contact volume
AI Agents and Outreach
Reply.io differentiator is Jason AI, an autonomous SDR at $259/mo. Jason handles lead discovery, sequence creation, outreach, and reply management. It also includes LinkedIn automation with automated connection requests and messages.
Apollo does not have an autonomous AI agent. Sequences include email, manual LinkedIn task steps, and calling. Apollo approach is more traditional: you research, build lists, create sequences, and manage campaigns manually.
The AI assists with email writing but does not run autonomously. Both include a CRM and dialer. Apollo CRM is deeper with deal tracking and revenue analytics.
Reply.io CRM is functional but simpler.
Key takeaways
- Reply.io Jason AI runs outreach autonomously
- Apollo uses traditional manual sequence building
- Apollo LinkedIn steps are manual tasks; Reply.io automates them
- Both include CRM and dialer
Start sending today
Set up in 15 minutes. Dedicated IPs on every plan.
Why Consider SendKit Instead
Apollo and Reply.io are both full platforms that go beyond basic cold email. If you need sales intelligence, Apollo is the right choice. If you want AI-driven autonomous outreach, Reply.io is the right choice.
But both run on shared infrastructure with no dedicated IPs. If cold email deliverability is what drives your results, SendKit provides what neither platform includes: dedicated IPs and isolated infrastructure on every plan from $99/mo. SendKit uses flat-rate pricing with no per-user charges.
Built-in dialer, CRM, and all deliverability tools. It does not have sales intelligence or an AI SDR. It is built for teams where infrastructure determines results.
Key takeaways
- Dedicated IPs on every plan from $99/mo
- Flat-rate pricing vs per-user
- No sales intelligence or AI SDR
- Built for teams where infrastructure drives results
Pros & Cons
Apollo.io
Strengths
- 275M+ database with buyer intent data
- Built-in CRM with deal tracking
- Free plan to start
- Dialer on Professional and above
- Deep sales intelligence with alerts
Limitations
- No dedicated IPs
- Per-user pricing is expensive for teams
- No autonomous AI SDR agent
- LinkedIn steps are manual tasks
Reply.io
Strengths
- Jason AI SDR for autonomous outreach ($259/mo)
- 1B+ contact database built in
- LinkedIn automation in sequences
- Cloud calling and CRM
- Email validation included
Limitations
- No dedicated IPs
- No buyer intent data or sales intelligence
- Jason AI at $259/mo is expensive
- No free plan
SendKit
Strengths
- Dedicated IPs on every plan from $99/mo
- Flat-rate pricing
- All deliverability tools included
- Built-in dialer and CRM
- 75,000 emails/month on the $99 plan
Limitations
- No sales intelligence or intent data
- No AI SDR agent
- 700M+ database is smaller than Reply.io's 1B+ contacts
- Newer platform with a smaller user community
Ready to switch?
Your reputation, your control. No shared infrastructure.
Got questions? We've got answers.
Apollo is better for sales intelligence with intent data and a deeper CRM. Reply.io is better for AI-driven autonomous outreach with Jason AI. Different tools for different workflows.
Ready to hit primary?
Set up SendKit's isolated infrastructure and start sending in under 15 minutes.
Dedicated IPs on every plan. Cancel anytime.

